For Digibar, which features content created by human copywriters, the results revealed that no respondents rated Digibar content as poor (1 star). This suggests that none of the participants found the human-generated content to be of the lowest quality. Only 2 participants (6.67%) gave a 2-star rating. This indicates a minimal dissatisfaction with the content, but the majority of respondents found it to be better than poor. 6 respondents (20%) rated Digibar content with 3 stars. While this is a significant portion, it still suggests that the majority of participants had a positive perception of the human-generated content. The most common rating for Digibar content was 4 stars, chosen by 11 respondents (36.67%). This suggests a strong overall positive sentiment towards the quality of content produced by human copywriters. An additional 11 participants (36.67%) gave the highest rating of 5 stars, indicating a substantial number of respondents highly valued the quality of the content on the Digibar website. The majority of respondents (73.34%) rated Digibar content as either very good (4 stars) or excellent (5 stars), with a relatively small percentage expressing some level of dissatisfaction (2 or 3 stars). For Digiby, which features content generated by ChatGPT, (Generative AI), the results revealed that Similar to Digibar, no respondents rated Digiby content as poor (1 star). It is fascinating, however, that there were no respondents who gave a 2-star rating to Digiby content as compared to 2 participants who gave  Digibar a 2-star rating. 3 participants (10%) rated Digiby content with 3 stars. 14 respondents (46.67%) gave Digiby content a 4-star rating, signifying a substantial positive sentiment towards the quality of the AI-generated content. An additional 13 participants (43.33%) rated Digiby content with 5 stars, indicating a strong overall positive perception. The majority of respondents (90%) rated Digiby content as either good (4 stars) or excellent (5 stars), with only a small percentage expressing some level of dissatisfaction (3 stars).The average rating for Digibar was 4.033 whereas the average rating for Digiby was 4.33. The results show that the respondents found the text on both websites to be of good quality. However, the Digiby website received slightly higher ratings, which suggests that the respondents found the text generated by Generative AI to be slightly better than the text written by human copywriters.For the second question in the survey, I asked which website respondents think was generated by ChatGPT. Out of the 30 respondents, 18 participants (60%) chose Digibar as text generated by ChatGPT. The result indicates a majority perception that Digibar, the website featuring content generated by human copywriters, is likely to be the source of the text generated by ChatGPT. Whereas 12 participants (40%) chose Digiby as text content generated by ChatGPT (Generative AI). The survey results revealed that a majority of participants (18 out of 30) incorrectly identified the human-generated content (Digibar) as being produced by Generative AI. Only 12 participants correctly identified Digiby as the website generated by ChatGPT. This finding suggests that individuals have difficulty distinguishing between human-written and Generative AI-generated text. Thus from the first question in the survey where respondents chose Digiby as the website with higher text quality most of the respondents were a bit biased in the second question in the survey by associating quality content with human creation, therefore incorrectly choosing Digibar as the website with content generated by ChatGPT. 

For Google Analytics, in the last 7 days, Digibar recorded 1 new user and 11 event counts. In Google Analytics, an event is a user interaction or occurrence on your website or app that you want to track. Events can be anything from clicking a button to watching a video to completing a purchase. By tracking events, you can gain valuable insights into user behavior and measure the success of specific actions on your site or app. The event count is the total number of times an event has been triggered during a specified time period. Digibar had 5 page views. Digiby, in contrast, exhibited a more robust performance over the same period. With 9 new users and a notable 45 event count. This showcases a higher level of user engagement compared to Digibar. The visitor distribution is diverse, with 7 from the United States, 1 from Canada, and 1 from Ghana. Digiby had 18 page views. Digiby outperforms Digibar in terms of new users and event count, indicating a potential advantage in user attraction and interaction through AI-generated content. The geographic distribution of Digiby’s visitors is also more diverse, spanning across North America and Africa. This suggests that AI-generated content may have a broader international appeal compared to human-generated content, which is crucial for websites aiming to reach a global audience. The findings of this analysis suggest that Generative AI-produced content may be an effective alternative to Human-Written content for websites.